Quivvo vs E2B
Both Quivvo and E2B give AI agents isolated cloud machines. The main differences are price and session length: a 2 vCPU, 4 GiB machine costs $0.054 per running hour on Quivvo and about $0.166 on E2B, and E2B's pricing page limits sessions to 1 hour on Hobby and 24 hours on Pro, while Quivvo machines have no session limit. E2B has been around longer, offers SDKs and has an enterprise tier.
How do they compare?
| Quivvo | E2B | |
|---|---|---|
| 2 vCPU + 4 GiB, per running hour | $0.054 | $0.166 |
| Per vCPU-hour | $0.005 | $0.0504 |
| Per GiB-hour of memory | $0.011 | $0.0162 |
| Disk | $0.20 per GiB-month | Included: 10 GiB on Hobby, 20 GiB on Pro |
| Longest session | No limit; suspends when idle | 1 hour on Hobby, 24 hours on Pro |
| Ways to drive it | CLI, REST API, hosted MCP server, TypeScript and Python SDKs | SDKs and API |
| Bring your own cloud | No | Yes, on Enterprise |
E2B's figures come from its pricing page, read on 31 October 2026. The hourly prices are our arithmetic from its per-second rates.
When should I choose E2B?
Choose E2B if you need a bring-your-own-cloud deployment, or want a provider with a long record: its site says more than 2 billion sandboxes have run on it. Quivvo doesn't offer bring-your-own-cloud.
When should I choose Quivvo?
Choose Quivvo if your agents do long-running work and you want a machine that keeps its state rather than a session that ends. A Quivvo machine has root, Docker on the default template and a persistent disk at /data. It suspends when idle, keeping memory and processes when it can and otherwise stopping, which keeps the disk, and wakes on the next command. It also costs about a third as much per running hour at list price, and its prepaid credit doesn't expire.
See the full pricing comparison.
Give your agent a computer
npx quivvo@latest sh